Impact of AMD and DME on Quality of Life

Now Viewing

EP: 1.Impact of AMD and DME on Quality of Life

EP: 2.AMD and DME: Factors Affecting Treatment Selection and the Importance of Shared Decision-Making

EP: 3.Implications of Treat-and-Extend With Faricimab in AMD

EP: 4.MOA of Faricimab and 2-Year Data Review

EP: 5.Incorporating Faricimab in Clinical Practice

EP: 6.Unmet Needs in AMD and DME

EP: 7.Take-Home Points for the Treatment of AMD and DME

David A. Eichenbaum, MD, FASRS: Hello, and thank you for joining this Modern Retina Insights, titled Longevity in Anti-VEGF Inhibitors Utilized in AMD and DME. I'm David A. Eichenbaum, director of research at Retina Vitreous Associates of Florida and collaborative associate professor at the Morsani College of Medicine of the University of South Florida. I'm joined by my very good friend and mentor, Caroline Baumal, professor of ophthalmology and co-director of the retina service at Tufts New England Eye Center in Boston, Massachusetts. Hi, Caroline.

Caroline Baumal, MD: David, it's great to be here with you.

David A. Eichenbaum, MD, FASRS: Always a pleasure. Always one of my favorite conversations of the year when I get to start these with you. Our discussion today will be reviewing longevity of anti-VEGF [vascular endothelial growth factor] inhibitors utilized in age-related macular degeneration with choroidal neovascularization and diabetic macular edema, as well as reviewing the 2-year data shown in the TENAYA, LUCERNE, YOSEMITE, and RHINE studies. Let's begin. Caroline: in your practice, what is the impact of wet macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema on the quality of life of these different types of patients?

Caroline Baumal, MD: David, I think that's so important to consider. When I look back through my career and I think what times were like before we had anti-VEGF therapy, you could really see how it affected patients even more and it still greatly affects the patients that we see today. In the majority of patients I see in my practice, probably 60%-78% are patients with either wet AMD [age-related macular degeneration] or diabetic macular edema. Even though they're different diseases affecting different age groups, it affects patients in a very similar manner. It affects their ability to drive, to read, to be independent in either disease process, especially when they develop advanced disease. Because of that, we all know how important vision is and the fear of loss of vision that happens in young patients who need it for their ability to work. In older patients who need their vision to stay independent and drive and be able to do things like see their food and get around. The impact is huge, and for our patients, nothing is as important as their vision.

David A. Eichenbaum, MD, FASRS: I remember this because I trained with you in 2005-2007, which was pretty much the dawn of the anti-VEGF monotherapy era. I remember seeing patients who had been in the MARINA and ANCHOR trials, and those who were randomized to sham or photodynamic therapy, when you covered them up their fellow eye to treat them in extension in their investigative eye if they had been randomized to not anti-VEGF if they'd been randomized to sham or PDT [photodynamic therapy], they just couldn't see you once they were covered up. You knew immediately which treatment the patient had been randomized to because, before the era of pharmacotherapy, lots of these patients really couldn't see. The quality-of-life improvements with good treatment are profound. We forget that neovascular macular degeneration, which had very limited options before anti-angiogenic therapy, is a centrally blinding disease; it's a bear. I tell my patients that we just got a good bear trap and we're coming up with better ones all the time, and we got a good handle on it, but it's still a bad disease.

Caroline Baumal, MD: Right. That's so important because we used to see patients. I remember when I started in my career, and I'm not going to tell you when that was, there was virtually nothing to offer these patients. I did retina partially because I love surgery, but I love medical retina too. We were so limited in what we could offer patients. They wouldn't come in because they knew that there was no treatment. Then when we got anti-VEGF therapies, patients started to hear the word that there was some treatment from macular degeneration. Over the last decade, now we see patients so much earlier when they develop neovascular AMD, because they know from talking to the friends and other eyecare providers that there are treatments that are available. We get to see patients earlier, treat them earlier, even preserve more vision. But even with the anti-VEGF monotherapies and the success we've had with this, now in the long term, I think we've encountered another issue: the burden of treatment.

David A. Eichenbaum, MD, FASRS: Exactly.

Transcript edited for clarity