
QA102 data suggest signal in intermediate dry AMD, but insignificant drusen volume change
Oral QA102 shows imaging signals slowing drusen and GA progression in intermediate dry AMD at ARVO 2026, despite missing its primary end point.
The phase 2 QA102-CS201 study (
“Intermediate AMD represents the most prevalent stage of the disease, yet remains an area of significant unmet medical need with a lack of therapies to slow or prevent progression,” Scott Whitcup, MD, said in the release. The company also quoted principal investigator Sunil Patel, MD, PhD, from Abeline Surgery Center, who described the findings as “very encouraging” for patients with intermediate or advanced dry AMD.1
According to MingMed Biotechnology,1 the QA102-CS201 trial enrolled 150 patients with intermediate atrophic AMD and randomly assigned them 1:1:1 to QA102 200 mg, QA102 400 mg, or placebo twice daily for up to 15 months. The study was described as double-masked, randomized, and placebo-controlled.
What did the QA102-CS201 study find?
After 12 months of treatment, the company reported that mean change in drusen volume was reduced by 59.2% in the QA102 400-mg group relative to placebo, however the primary efficacy end point did not show a statistically significant difference between groups. Reported secondary or exploratory findings favored the higher-dose group, with a 118.2% reduction in drusen volume growth rate vs placebo (P = .017) and a 42.7% reduction in square root–transformed GA area growth rate (P = .026).1
“Drusen volume was not an FDA-approved endpoint when this Phase II study began in 2022, and it was not yet clear which clinical endpoint would be most sensitive to treatment or how the FDA would view it,” Patel said in an exchange with Ophthalmology Times. “We therefore selected drusen volume as the primary endpoint and included several key secondary endpoints. Although the primary endpoint did not reach statistical significance, QA102 showed a strong dose-dependent numerical trend toward reducing drusen volume, with a p-value of 0.089.”
The Age-Related Eye Disease Study established progression risk categories and showed the benefit of antioxidant plus zinc supplementation in selected patients with at least intermediate AMD, but nutritional therapy has not been shown to reverse drusen burden or clearly halt atrophic progression.2 More recently, intravitreal complement inhibitors have been approved for GA secondary to AMD, but these agents are indicated for established GA rather than the intermediate stage and require repeated injections. An effective oral therapy that delays structural progression earlier in disease would therefore address a clear gap if confirmed in larger studies. Fred Ouyang, PhD, chief technology officer of MingMed Biotechnology, called QA102 a “first-in-class oral therapy for atrophic AMD,”1 but did not disclose the drug’s mechanism of action.
The company said QA102 showed an "acceptable safety profile” but did not report discontinuation rates, serious adverse events, or laboratory findings. Subsequent reporting from Patel has shed light on the drug's tolerability profile. He mentioned the most frequent side effects observed were gastrointestinal—mostly mild or moderate diarrhea, with an overall occurrence rate of 14.7%. These events resolved upon discontinuation of the medication and appeared to be independent of dose, suggesting a possible hypersensitivity mechanism rather than a direct drug effect. Patel noted that patients should be counseled about these potential side effects and that future trials may consider excluding those with a history of recurrent diarrhea or specific GI illnesses.






















